What combination of leadership
and technical capabilities,
experience and aptitudes defines
the highest-performing C-suite
leaders? It’s a question that
CEOs wrestle with as they build
their teams and think about the
succession of top-team roles, and
one that aspiring leaders consider
when thinking about their careers.
One thing is certain: the demands on
the top functional leaders continue to
grow. With businesses operating in an
environment of sustained uncertainty, an increased regulatory overlay, and heightened
expectations from employees, investors and
other stakeholders, CEOs rely on top-team
leaders to navigate unprecedented market
complexity, risk and the rapid pace of change.
Increasingly, achieving the strategic objectives
of the business requires that functional and
business leaders collaborate in new ways to
plan and execute key initiatives and remove
barriers to change. Senior functional leaders
today also are more likely to engage with
the board of directors, having to anticipate
directors’ concerns and perspectives on
strategic issues.
These leaders can have a profound impact
on the business. Those who excel are able to
articulate a sound strategy and put in place
the team, structure and processes necessary
to actualize plans and achieve key objectives.
Less effective leaders might get just part of
the equation right, for example, helping to
define the right strategy but failing to bring
it to life for the organization, or they may be
skilled at execution but unable to define a
new strategy.
Selecting the right functional leaders today
and ensuring that the organization is
developing the next generation is all the
more challenging for one important reason:
The nature and scope of top functional roles
— whether in finance, marketing, human
resources, information technology, legal or
supply chain — are markedly different than
the roles reporting to these leaders.
The critical consideration when assessing
next-generation functional leaders, then, is,
“Can they make the leap?”
Making an impact: What we know about high-performing C-suite leaders
The ability to assess whether executives can make the leap to senior leadership roles is critical to the health of the
business: Making the right leadership choices matters, especially at the most senior levels. Consider a couple of
real-life examples:
Based on experience alone, the executive selected as
the new chief human resources officer (CHRO) of a $50
billion technology company may not have seemed to be
an obvious choice. She had not been a CHRO before,
even at a smaller company, so therefore had not had
much previous exposure to the board or the full
breadth of HR issues. Nevertheless, she understood
the culture, knew the business and was well-respected
in the organization. In her assessment, she displayed
exceptional ability in conceptual thinking and in reading
complex organizational and people dynamics; she
understood individuals’ underlying agendas and could
see the political dynamics at play in a situation. She
leveraged these skills to help build alignment around
key issues and kept everyone working effectively
together. Colleagues would go to her for advice because
she had something valuable to say. Having quickly
earned respect and credibility with the board, CEO and
management team, she had a big early impact on the
business, especially on CEO succession planning — a
place where CHROs can make a big difference in the
organization or be sidelined when they lack influence
with the board and CEO.
Conversely, having the right expertise on paper is no
guarantee that an executive will have an impact on the
business. A new chief information officer (CIO) hired to
lead the digital transformation for a large industrial
business had previous experience as a CIO and exceptional
strategic thinking skills. He had the experience,
knowledge and capabilities to do the job. And while he
could inspire colleagues with his vision for the business,
he lacked the ability to effectively influence and
collaborate with other executives. Colleagues felt that
he talked down to them and signaled that he was
smarter than everyone else. The execution of the strategy
failed under him because he couldn’t build support
for transformation initiatives. For the transformation to
be successful, the company needed someone able to
translate the vision for different roles and business
units and have the patience to bring people along.
Why are some executives able to have such a positive impact on an organization, while
others cannot? The specific business context, how well the individual fits the requirements
of the role and the organizational culture, and the clarity of the objectives for the
role all contribute to an individual’s success. But we have found that the C-level leaders
who are most able to make a difference in their organizations have well-developed leadership
capabilities and the ability to adapt and grow with the job and the business.
Our research has identified the critical leadership capabilities that have the greatest influence
on executive performance. For top functional leaders, three capabilities tend to be
most important:
-
Collaborating and influencing — identifying and building relationships with stakeholders
and facilitating dialogue to forge consensus and collectively achieve objectives
- Leading people — managing, empowering and leading people, delegating roles
and projects
- Building capability — gaining an understanding of individuals’ capabilities and
systematically developing people
In a matrixed business, for example, the ability to
collaborate and influence the CEO and other
management team leaders is a difference maker. It is
far more difficult to influence and collaborate with
executives outside of one’s own functional domain
who don’t share the same language or perspective
on the business. Executives who excel in this area
have a strong understanding of the drivers of the
business and find ways to engage and build partnerships
with their colleagues. These executives also are
most likely to end up in the CEO’s inner cabinet; they
become a counselor to the CEO and have a disproportionate
impact on the senior team, the strategy
and the broader organization.
Senior functional leaders who lack the ability to collaborate
and influence risk becoming pigeonholed — the
human resources leader who is stuck as the “people”
person, the CIO as the “technology” person, the GC as the naysayer or the
CFO who is regarded at the “accountant.” Indeed,
interviews with companies revealed that a primary
reason for the failure of a new executive in the first 12
to 18 months is the inability to influence and collaborate
across functions and business units.
Similarly, a strong capability in building teams is a
cornerstone for success in top functional leadership
roles. Among senior leaders who were highly successful
in their first 18 months, the ability to build and
empower highly capable teams was a primary reason.
These executives place
the right people in the
right roles, making
tough decisions when
necessary. They pay
attention to culture,
individual roles and
responsibilities, and
identify the skill gaps and opportunities for improvement. They are able to
create a team of highly talented people who work
together and are more than the sum of their parts. This
is important because many first-time functional leaders
do not have previous experience managing large,
multi-layered teams.
Succession planning:
The capability gap
Despite the importance of these executive capabilities,
hundreds of assessments of chief functional leaders
and their direct reports reveal a wide capability gap
between them. Direct reports of the top functional
executives score significantly lower on the six core
capabilities critical to success than the functional leaders
themselves, the
equivalent to three to
four years of development.
Promoting
someone into a senior
functional leadership role
before they are ready
creates a sort of “value
gap,” where the person is
not able to have the full
impact within their functional
purview — or
more broadly — because they are less skilled at influencing,
lack knowledge about the drivers of the
business or other functional areas, haven’t been
exposed to enough of the business, or fail to build and
empower a strong team. Without the domain expertise
and experience in the role, they may lack the confidence
to engage in debate about the critical issues
facing the business, limiting their ability to be a true
adviser to the CEO and management team.
Promoting someone into a senior functional leadership role before they are ready creates a sort of “value gap,”
where the person is not able to have the full impact within their functional purview — or more broadly ...
How can organizations get functional leaders the development
time they need, short of placing them in the role?
It’s a fundamental challenge for companies, and one that
can be difficult to solve. In many functions, the roles
under the top leader are often highly specialized, making
it more difficult to move within the function to gain experience.
Many functional roles do not involve managing
large teams of people or require much collaboration, so
executives are not assessed on these capabilities as they
move up in the organization.
Still, job rotation, P&L experience, exposure to other functional
areas and business units do help prepare leaders
for larger and more complex roles. When looking at business
unit executives, who tend to have early P&L
responsibility and broader exposer to the functions even
at a regional level, we see a smaller capability gap
between the top leader and his or her direct reports than
the gap between functional leaders and their direct
reports. These experiences develop leadership capabilities,
building knowledge of the business and how
different functions affect the business. The organizations
that are most adept at developing succession-ready functional
leaders identify high potentials early, so they have
the most options for moving people around. When direct
P&L experience is difficult to provide, it can be helpful to
rotate high potential executives in functional roles within
a business unit.
We know what it takes to succeed in top functional roles
With insights into the forces shaping functional roles and relationships with highly sought-after candidates, we are able to help our clients find leaders who will have a lasting impact on their organizations. Learn more
Closing the gap: What does it take?
Demonstrated capabilities represent just part of the story
when it comes to assessing executives for top functional
roles. Knowledge and capabilities are not enough to predict
how a senior leader might do in the most senior-level roles,
which are more complex and ambiguous. As executives
move higher in the organization, past knowledge and relationships
become less effective tools for accomplishing
business objectives and navigating the challenges they will
encounter. The context changes and executives must make
sense of a much wider set of issues with less concrete
information, and then conceptualize a clear plan, inspiring,
engaging and motivating a large organization to act.
Furthermore, no succession candidate is 100 percent ready
for a senior functional leadership role, regardless of how
well they have been prepared. There will be gaps in their
experience and knowledge.
Senior functional leaders who
lack the ability to collaborate and influence risk becoming pigeonholed — the human resources leader who is stuck as the “people” person, the
CIO as the “technology” person, the GC as the naysayer or the CFO who is regarded as the “accountant.”
For these reasons, it is important to understand an individual’s ability to stretch beyond
his or her current capabilities to continue to grow and change with the job and the
company. We call this Executive Intelligence.
Executive Intelligence assessments measure five key dimensions: business intelligence,
contextual intelligence, interpersonal intelligence, learning intelligence and conceptual
intelligence. Executives with strong business intelligence are able to apply analytical
judgment in complex and ambiguous situations. An executive with a high degree of
contextual intelligence is able to consider issues from an organizational or social
perspective, while someone with highly developed interpersonal intelligence has the ability
to read and respond to others’ emotional state so they can have constructive
interactions. Conceptual intelligence enables leaders to produce big-picture insights
from complex and disparate information. Finally, a high degree of learning intelligence
allows individuals to change how they think and act in light of new information.
Executives with high Executive Intelligence scores have far more room to grow. Over
time, they will bypass others who don’t score as well. High ExI also scores correlate with
faster executive promotions. An analysis of more than 700 CEOs, managing directors,
COOs and CFOs globally found that executives with high ExI scores were promoted 22
percent faster than executives with low ExI scores. In other words, these executives were
promoted one year earlier on average than those with lower scores.
Furthermore, new functional leaders with high ExI scores also are likely to be more effective
advisers to the CEO and management team early in their tenure, before they have
had the time to develop the knowledge base and domain expertise for their roles. These
executives approach issues with clear structured thinking and are able to communicate
succinctly and effectively, making them a strong partner in the debate and discussion of
critical business issues.
Conclusion
Selecting the right leaders for senior functional roles is challenging
because the nature and scope of these positions are markedly different
than the roles reporting to them. By recognizing the capability gap,
organizations can take concrete measures to build the skills of functional
leaders to better prepare them for the most senior roles. But no
new leader will be completely ready for all the demands of a top
management position, so it is important to understand their potential
to grow with the position and provide support for new leaders in the
form of a strong team or an external coach.